Monument record 8205/4 - The Roman East Rampart at the south east angle of the fortress

Please read our .

Summary

Evidence for the Roman defensive rampart between Thimbleby’s Tower and the south east angle tower has been recorded on a number of occasions since 1908 when the earth rampart was recorded surviving to a height of 1.5m and for a distance of 4.5m at No 12 St John Street. Subsequent investigations at the same site in 1996 revealed further evidence of the construction of the rampart. To the south, work at the south east angle tower has recorded evidence of the eastern rampart in 1930, 1951 and in 2011. First recorded here in 1930, the evidence for the rampart consisted primarily of the timber base. In 1951 and in 2011 further evidence of the construction of the rampart was encountered. The defences of the Roman fortress comprised several components: The rampart (artificial bank), built in the late first century, consisted of a core of sand, clay or rubble held in place to the front and rear by revetments of stacked turves. It was set on a base of close-set transverse logs and measured approx 6m wide by perhaps 3m high. The top of the rampart would have been flattened to create a walkway that could be patrolled and would have had been protected by a wooden palisade. In all the defences defined a rectangular space some 592m long and 411m wide. Towers, initially of timber and measuring 4.42m square, were also placed at regular intervals along each wall as well as at each angle of the fortress, while four major gates were placed at each main access point to control traffic in and out. There may originally have been 44 towers in all, including angle and gate towers, the angle towers perhaps being about 45m apart. The towers were later rebuilt in stone, measuring about 6.5 m square, with the angle towers being slightly larger. They were now placed slightly further apart, at about 62.5m, and the total number reduced to 34 or 36. The rampart was separated from a substantial outer ditch by a flat area called a berm. The berm was about 1.8m wide and the primary ditch about 3m wide by 1.5m deep. At a later date the defences were further strengthened by the insertion of a stone revetment wall laid in regular courses each about 0.30m high against the outer face of the rampart. This measured about 1.5m wide by about 4.75m to wall walk level and was again surmounted by stone breastwork. The ditch was widened and deepened, perhaps up to 7m by 3m, although re-cutting has made the dimensions difficult to measure. The date of construction of the stone revetment wall is disputed. It is possible that the southern and eastern sectors were started at the beginning of the second century, along with the towers, but that remaining sectors were not completed until the early third century. Evidence of two phases of reconstruction incorporating re-used stones has been found on all but the south side, accompanied in some cases by rubble in the ditch. It is suggested that reconstruction to the original width is to be dated to the start of the fourth century, but that doubling of the width may belong to the Saxon period.

Map

Type and Period (2)

Full Description

Evidence for the Roman defensive rampart between Thimbleby’s Tower and the south east angle tower has been recorded on a number of occasions since 1908.

In 1908 traces of the earth rampart were recorded surviving to a height of 1.5m and 0.8m thick to the rear of the fortress wall during excavations at No 12 St John Street, however there was evidence of later truncation on the interior edge of the rampart. The rampart was identified over a length of 4.5m (1)

Later investigations at No 12 St John Street in 1996 also encountered traces of the earth rampart in a single evaluation trench excavated to the rear of the known line of the Roman wall. The rampart consisted of layers of natural clay and turf comprising compacted blackish loam [208]. A later deposit of brown clay loam [205] appears to have been added over the original earthwork and it was suggested by the excavator that this represented a later phase of construction intended to heighten the rampart. (5)

In 1930 the earth rampart surrounding the south east angle tower was also recorded. In this case the bank consisted of layers of grey clay and blackish earth with traces of oak timbers in the lower part of the bank, possibly representing the timber strapping used as a base for the rampart. (2)

Later work in 1951 carried out by G Webster at the south east angle tower included a single trench 0.60m wide cutting the earth rampart allowing for the recording of a full profile of the rampart. The construction of the bank appeared typical of that recorded elsewhere comprising a timber strapping base, two sections of layered turves to the front and rear of the rampart and a rubble core. (4)

More recent investigations at the south east angle tower in 2011 also encountered evidence of the earth rampart surrounding the tower. The excavations were carried out in advance of landscaping and enhancement to the area and required the excavations of 26 small trenches across the area each measuring 0.50m by 0.50m with the aim of identifying the depth of archaeological survival. In this limited excavation, evidence of the rampart was identified in three trenches.

The evidence consisted of a layer of grey and brown silty clay [context 1303] in trench 13 and a similar layer in trench 15 [context 1503] within the interior of the tower. These deposits were interpreted by the excavator as the in situ remains of the earth rampart. Further evidence of the rampart was also encountered in trench 21 to the south of the tower comprising a layer of clay [context 2105]. (7)

The defences of the Roman fortress comprised several components: The rampart (artificial bank), built in the late first century, consisted of a core of sand, clay or rubble held in place to the front and rear by revetments of stacked turves. It was set on a base of close-set transverse logs and measured approx 6m wide by perhaps 3m high. The top of the rampart would have been flattened to create a walkway that could be patrolled and would have had been protected by a wooden palisade. In all the defences defined a rectangular space some 592m long and 411m wide.


<1> Newstead, R (Prof.), 1909, On a recently discovered section of the Roman wall at Chester (Article in Journal). SCH5556.

<2> Newstead, R (Prof.), 1932, The S.E. Corner of the Roman Fortress. Chester (Article in Journal). SCH5709.

<3> Newstead, R (Prof.), 1948, Records of Archaeological Finds VI (Article in Journal). SCH5761.

<4> Webster, Graham, 1952, Excavations on the Legionary Defences at Chester, 1949-52 (Part i) (Article in Journal). SCH5715.

<5> Chester Archaeology, 1996, Chester 12 St John Street 1996 Excavation, R2165 (Client Report). SCH4050.

<6> LeQuesne C, 1999, Excavations at Chester: The Roman and Later Defences Part I (Monograph). SCH6156.

<7> Lawson, P H, 1926, Schedule of the Roman Remains of Chester with Maps and Plans, No.46 (Article in Journal). SCH5956.

<8> Harris, B.E. (ed), 1987, Victoria County History - A History of the County of Chester: Volume I, p121,124-128 (Book). SCH3556.

<9> Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 1911-Present, Journal of Roman Studies, Vol 42 p94 (Journal/Periodical). SCH1519.

<10> British Archaeological Association, 1847-present, Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 5/212 (Journal/Periodical). SCH1578.

<11> Ordnance Survey, 1870-1982, Ordnance Survey Archaeological Record Card, 1981 SJ46NW18 (Index). SCH2487.

Sources/Archives (11)

  • <1> Article in Journal: Newstead, R (Prof.). 1909. On a recently discovered section of the Roman wall at Chester. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 16: 1.
  • <2> Article in Journal: Newstead, R (Prof.). 1932. The S.E. Corner of the Roman Fortress. Chester. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 29.
  • <3> Article in Journal: Newstead, R (Prof.). 1948. Records of Archaeological Finds VI. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 36, Part 2.
  • <4> Article in Journal: Webster, Graham. 1952. Excavations on the Legionary Defences at Chester, 1949-52 (Part i). Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 39.
  • <5> Client Report: Chester Archaeology. 1996. Chester 12 St John Street 1996 Excavation. R2165. S0143. N/A. R2165.
  • <6> Monograph: LeQuesne C. 1999. Excavations at Chester: The Roman and Later Defences Part I. Survey Report No 11.
  • <7> Article in Journal: Lawson, P H. 1926. Schedule of the Roman Remains of Chester with Maps and Plans. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 27, Part 1. No.46.
  • <8> Book: Harris, B.E. (ed). 1987. Victoria County History - A History of the County of Chester: Volume I. p121,124-128.
  • <9> Journal/Periodical: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. 1911-Present. Journal of Roman Studies. Vol 42 p94.
  • <10> Journal/Periodical: British Archaeological Association. 1847-present. Journal of the British Archaeological Association. 5/212.
  • <11> Index: Ordnance Survey. 1870-1982. Ordnance Survey Archaeological Record Card. 1981 SJ46NW18.

Related Monuments/Buildings (1)

Related Events/Activities (5)

External Links (0)

Location

Grid reference Centred SJ 407 661 (13m by 24m) (2 map features)
Map sheet SJ46NW
Civil Parish CHESTER NON PARISH AREA, CHESTER, CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER
Historic Township/Parish/County CHESTER, CHESTER HOLY TRINITY, CHESHIRE

Protected Status/Designation

Record last edited

Jul 4 2024 1:29PM