Monument record 8202/2 - Evidence of the Roman North Wall at King Charles Court

Please read our .

Summary

Traces of the rampart wall at King Charles Court was encountered during several phases of archaeological work along the present North Wall recording Roman masonry to a height of 2-3m above ground level. Subsequent work to the wall had disturbed the original Roman work however making identification problematic. Immediately to the rear of the Roman wall the rampart comprised several successive layers of sandstone rubble and yellow clay surviving up to the height of the fifth course of the wall below which the rear face of the wall was significantly more uneven and coarsely built. The defences of the Roman fortress comprised several components: The rampart (artificial bank), built in the late first century, consisted of a core of sand, clay or rubble held in place to the front and rear by revetments of stacked turves. It was set on a base of close-set transverse logs and measured approx 6m wide by perhaps 3m high. The top of the rampart would have been flattened to create a walkway that could be patrolled and would have had been protected by a wooden palisade. In all the defences defined a rectangular space some 592m long and 411m wide. Towers, initially of timber and measuring 4.42m square, were also placed at regular intervals along each wall as well as at each angle of the fortress, while four major gates were placed at each main access point to control traffic in and out. There may originally have been 44 towers in all, including angle and gate towers, the angle towers perhaps being about 45m apart. The towers were later rebuilt in stone, measuring about 6.5 m square, with the angle towers being slightly larger. They were now placed slightly further apart, at about 62.5m, and the total number reduced to 34 or 36. The rampart was separated from a substantial outer ditch by a flat area called a berm. The berm was about 1.8m wide and the primary ditch about 3m wide by 1.5m deep. At a later date the defences were further strengthened by the insertion of a stone revetment wall laid in regular courses each about 0.30m high against the outer face of the rampart. This measured about 1.5m wide by about 4.75m to wall walk level and was again surmounted by stone breastwork. The ditch was widened and deepened, perhaps up to 7m by 3m, although re-cutting has made the dimensions difficult to measure. The date of construction of the stone revetment wall is disputed. It is possible that the southern and eastern sectors were started at the beginning of the second century, along with the towers, but that remaining sectors were not completed until the early third century. Evidence of two phases of reconstruction incorporating re-used stones has been found on all but the south side, accompanied in some cases by rubble in the ditch. It is suggested that reconstruction to the original width is to be dated to the start of the fourth century, but that doubling of the width may belong to the Saxon period.

Map

Type and Period (2)

Full Description

A series of archaeological investigations at Northgate House, King Charles Court between 1978 and 1989/90 recorded evidence of the Roman defensive structure. The first investigation comprised observations in 1978 during the restoration of a 7m section of the City Wall 30-35m west of the North Gate during which investigations were limited to the area of masonry behind the outer skin of the city wall to a height of 2-3m above ground level. Survival was poor in this area and few finds or features were recovered from the area immediately in front of the wall, however at the western extent of the section eleven courses of Roman masonry was recorded. (1)

Subsequent work in 1980 at the Engineering Yard aimed to identify the line and character of the Roman defences however the results were fairly inconclusive and there may have been significant disturbance caused by late 19th century investigations further hampering the results. A section across the defences examined a portion of masonry the parapet confirming it as Roman in origin. (1)

More extensive investigations in 1984 just 5m to the west of the 1980 site revealed the lower two courses of the Roman wall above the plinth course and a well preserved fragment of cornice (3). The masonry all showed signs of extensive damage caused by the subsequent weight of the medieval and later wall structure. (1)

Finally in 1989/90 further investigations in the same area involved the complete rebuilding of a 7m section of the City Wall identifying not only foundation trench but also the base and plinth courses and a further nine courses of Roman masonry. Immediately to the rear of the Roman wall the rampart comprised several successive layers of sandstone rubble and yellow clay surviving up to the height of the fifth course of the wall below which the rear face of the wall was significantly more uneven and coarsely built. (1)

The date of construction of the stone revetment wall is disputed. It is possible that the southern and eastern sectors were started at the beginning of the second century, along with the towers, but that remaining sectors were not completed until the early third century. Evidence of two phases of reconstruction incorporating re-used stones has been found on all but the south side, accompanied in some cases by rubble in the ditch. It is suggested that reconstruction to the original width is to be dated to the start of the fourth century, but that doubling of the width may belong to the Saxon period.


<1> LeQuesne C, 1999, Excavations at Chester: The Roman and Later Defences Part I (Monograph). SCH6156.

<2> Haverfield, F, 1900, Catalogue of the Roman Sculptured stones in the Grosvenor Museum (Article in Journal). SCH5530.

<3> multiple authors, 1980/81, Excavation Reports and Sites Observed, 10/39-40 Strickland T J 1984 (Article in Journal). SCH5806.

Sources/Archives (3)

  • <1> Monograph: LeQuesne C. 1999. Excavations at Chester: The Roman and Later Defences Part I. Survey Report No 11.
  • <2> Article in Journal: Haverfield, F. 1900. Catalogue of the Roman Sculptured stones in the Grosvenor Museum. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 7.
  • <3> Article in Journal: multiple authors. 1980/81. Excavation Reports and Sites Observed. Cheshire Archaeological Bulletin. No 7. 10/39-40 Strickland T J 1984.

Related Monuments/Buildings (1)

Related Events/Activities (6)

External Links (0)

Location

Grid reference Centred SJ 403 666 (25m by 10m) (2 map features)
Map sheet SJ46NW
Civil Parish CHESTER NON PARISH AREA, CHESTER, CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER
Historic Township/Parish/County CHESTER, CHESTER HOLY TRINITY, CHESHIRE

Protected Status/Designation

Record last edited

Jul 4 2024 1:37PM