Monument record 8206/4 - Evidence of the Roman East Wall at the Drum Tower

Please read our .

Summary

Traces of the Roman wall was recorded during excavations in the present City Wall around the medieval Drum Tower.The excavations were carried out by Prof Newstead who investigated approximately 1.35m of the exterior wall face recording eight courses of Roman masonry standing to a height of 2.43m at the base of the present wall. The defences of the Roman fortress comprised several components: The rampart (artificial bank), built in the late first century, consisted of a core of sand, clay or rubble held in place to the front and rear by revetments of stacked turves. It was set on a base of close-set transverse logs and measured approx 6m wide by perhaps 3m high. The top of the rampart would have been flattened to create a walkway that could be patrolled and would have had been protected by a wooden palisade. In all the defences defined a rectangular space some 592m long and 411m wide. Towers, initially of timber and measuring 4.42m square, were also placed at regular intervals along each wall as well as at each angle of the fortress, while four major gates were placed at each main access point to control traffic in and out. There may originally have been 44 towers in all, including angle and gate towers, the angle towers perhaps being about 45m apart. The towers were later rebuilt in stone, measuring about 6.5 m square, with the angle towers being slightly larger. They were now placed slightly further apart, at about 62.5m, and the total number reduced to 34 or 36. The rampart was separated from a substantial outer ditch by a flat area called a berm. The berm was about 1.8m wide and the primary ditch about 3m wide by 1.5m deep. At a later date the defences were further strengthened by the insertion of a stone revetment wall laid in regular courses each about 0.30m high against the outer face of the rampart. This measured about 1.5m wide by about 4.75m to wall walk level and was again surmounted by stone breastwork. The ditch was widened and deepened, perhaps up to 7m by 3m, although re-cutting has made the dimensions difficult to measure. The date of construction of the stone revetment wall is disputed. It is possible that the southern and eastern sectors were started at the beginning of the second century, along with the towers, but that remaining sectors were not completed until the early third century. Evidence of two phases of reconstruction incorporating re-used stones has been found on all but the south side, accompanied in some cases by rubble in the ditch. It is suggested that reconstruction to the original width is to be dated to the start of the fourth century, but that doubling of the width may belong to the Saxon period.

Map

Type and Period (2)

Full Description

Evidence of the Roman East Wall, surviving in situ within the present City Wall was recorded in 1928 during preparations for a new parking area on the site of the former Hop-Pole Hotel Paddock. (2).

The excavations were carried out by Prof Newstead who investigated approximately 1.35m of the exterior wall face recording eight courses of masonry standing to a height of 2.43m at the base of the present wall. Evidence of some shifting and damage to the Roman courses was noted with the chamfered plinth now overhung by the upper courses by approximately 0.43m while the lower two courses showed signs of crushing. The foundations of the Roman wall comprised crushed sandstone set in puddle clay, as recorded elsewhere in the city resting on the natural bedrock. The earth in advance of the exterior face of the Roman wall showed significant disturbance with residual finds of Roman date mixed in with medieval and post medieval material (2)

Further investigations at the site in 1983 encountered a fragment of Roman cornice stone in the medieval Drum Tower (1)

The date of construction of the stone revetment wall is disputed. It is possible that the southern and eastern sectors were started at the beginning of the second century, along with the towers, but that remaining sectors were not completed until the early third century. Evidence of two phases of reconstruction incorporating re-used stones has been found on all but the south side, accompanied in some cases by rubble in the ditch. It is suggested that reconstruction to the original width is to be dated to the start of the fourth century, but that doubling of the width may belong to the Saxon period.


<1> Grosvenor Museum, 1988, Grosvenor Museum Excavation section: Current Activities & Upcoming Sites (Unpublished Report). SCH6282.

<2> Newstead, R (Prof.), 1948, Records of Archaeological Finds VI (Article in Journal). SCH5761.

<3> Harris, B.E. (ed), 1987, Victoria County History - A History of the County of Chester: Volume I, p124 (Book). SCH3556.

<4> Ordnance Survey, 1870-1982, Ordnance Survey Archaeological Record Card, 1981 SJ46NW18 (Index). SCH2487.

Sources/Archives (4)

  • <1> Unpublished Report: Grosvenor Museum. 1988. Grosvenor Museum Excavation section: Current Activities & Upcoming Sites.
  • <2> Article in Journal: Newstead, R (Prof.). 1948. Records of Archaeological Finds VI. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. Volume 36, Part 2.
  • <3> Book: Harris, B.E. (ed). 1987. Victoria County History - A History of the County of Chester: Volume I. p124.
  • <4> Index: Ordnance Survey. 1870-1982. Ordnance Survey Archaeological Record Card. 1981 SJ46NW18.

Related Monuments/Buildings (1)

Related Events/Activities (2)

External Links (0)

Location

Grid reference Centred SJ 406 664 (5m by 10m) (2 map features)
Map sheet SJ46NW
Civil Parish CHESTER NON PARISH AREA, CHESTER, CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER
Historic Township/Parish/County CHESTER, CHESTER HOLY TRINITY, CHESHIRE

Protected Status/Designation

Record last edited

Jul 4 2024 1:38PM