Monument record 8201/5 - Evidence of the Roman North rampart at Abbey Green

Please read our .

Summary

Substantial evidence of the earth rampart was recorded at Abbey Green in the late 1970s where evidence of the typical construction was encountered comprising a timber beam base with earth turf walls and a rubble and sand core intersected with two further timber beam layers. On this occasion, evidence of a sandstone paved surface was also encountered over the top of the rampart creating a walkway on which the sentries would have stood. The defences of the Roman fortress comprised several components: The rampart (artificial bank), built in the late first century, consisted of a core of sand, clay or rubble held in place to the front and rear by revetments of stacked turves. It was set on a base of close-set transverse logs and measured approx 6m wide by perhaps 3m high. The top of the rampart would have been flattened to create a walkway that could be patrolled and would have had been protected by a wooden palisade. In all the defences defined a rectangular space some 592m long and 411m wide. Towers, initially of timber and measuring 4.42m square, were also placed at regular intervals along each wall as well as at each angle of the fortress, while four major gates were placed at each main access point to control traffic in and out. There may originally have been 44 towers in all, including angle and gate towers, the angle towers perhaps being about 45m apart. The towers were later rebuilt in stone, measuring about 6.5 m square, with the angle towers being slightly larger. They were now placed slightly further apart, at about 62.5m, and the total number reduced to 34 or 36. The rampart was separated from a substantial outer ditch by a flat area called a berm. The berm was about 1.8m wide and the primary ditch about 3m wide by 1.5m deep. At a later date the defences were further strengthened by the insertion of a stone revetment wall laid in regular courses each about 0.30m high against the outer face of the rampart. This measured about 1.5m wide by about 4.75m to wall walk level and was again surmounted by stone breastwork. The ditch was widened and deepened, perhaps up to 7m by 3m, although re-cutting has made the dimensions difficult to measure. The date of construction of the stone revetment wall is disputed. It is possible that the southern and eastern sectors were started at the beginning of the second century, along with the towers, but that remaining sectors were not completed until the early third century. Evidence of two phases of reconstruction incorporating re-used stones has been found on all but the south side, accompanied in some cases by rubble in the ditch. It is suggested that reconstruction to the original width is to be dated to the start of the fourth century, but that doubling of the width may belong to the Saxon period.

Map

Type and Period (2)

Full Description

Evidence of the Roman earth rampart was recorded during excavations in Abbey Green between 1975 and 1977. The rampart was encountered overlying an early timber interval tower (CHER 8487). The earth rampart encountered at Abbey Green consisted of the typical construction recorded elsewhere in the fortress comprising a timber strapping base each timber being around 4cm in diameter with substantial 2m wide turf revetments constructed at the front and at the rear of the feature, the remaining area was then in-filled with a 2m wide core of rubble and sand. Two further layers of timber strapping were also encountered at 0.75m and 1.50m above the base. (1)

A short length of the rampart walk was also recorded in situ, this comprised a section of sandstone paving set directly onto the rampart 3.7m from the vertical rear face and 1.9m above the base suggesting that the full height of the rampart was encountered at this location. (1)

In the early third century the earth rampart was raised and extended over the remains of the ovens and rampart buildings. (1)

The defences of the Roman fortress comprised several components: The rampart (artificial bank), built in the late first century, consisted of a core of sand, clay or rubble held in place to the front and rear by revetments of stacked turves. It was set on a base of close-set transverse logs and measured approx 6m wide by perhaps 3m high. The top of the rampart would have been flattened to create a walkway that could be patrolled and would have had been protected by a wooden palisade. In all the defences defined a rectangular space some 592m long and 411m wide.


<1> Newstead, R and J P Droop, 1935, The Roman Fortress at Chester: a Newly Discovered Turret and Rampart Building (Article in Journal). SCH6474.

<2> McPeake J.C. Bulmer M & Rutter J.A, 1980, Excavations in the garden of No. 1 Abbey Green, Chester, 1975-77 (Article in Journal). SCH5924.

<3> Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 1911-Present, Journal of Roman Studies, Taylor M V & Collingwood R G 1935 25/208 (Journal/Periodical). SCH1519.

<4> Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 1970-Present, Britannia, 7/319-20 Wilson D R 1976 (Journal/Periodical). SCH445.

<5> Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 1970-Present, Britannia, 8/385 Wilson D R 1977 (Journal/Periodical). SCH445.

<6> Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 1970-Present, Britannia, 9/429-30 Wilson D R 1978 (Journal/Periodical). SCH445.

<7> Harris, B.E. (ed), 1987, Victoria County History - A History of the County of Chester: Volume I, p122-4, 127-8 (Book). SCH3556.

<8> McPeake J.C., 1978, The First Century, /13-16 (Article in Journal). SCH6310.

<9> Earthworks Archaeological Services, 2004, Proposed breach in the City Walls at Rufus Court, Chester, R2533 (Client Report). SCH4587.

Sources/Archives (9)

  • <1> Article in Journal: Newstead, R and J P Droop. 1935. The Roman Fortress at Chester: a Newly Discovered Turret and Rampart Building. Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology (Liverpool). 22.
  • <2> Article in Journal: McPeake J.C. Bulmer M & Rutter J.A. 1980. Excavations in the garden of No. 1 Abbey Green, Chester, 1975-77. Journal of the Chester Archaeological and Historic Society. 63.
  • <3> Journal/Periodical: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. 1911-Present. Journal of Roman Studies. Taylor M V & Collingwood R G 1935 25/208.
  • <4> Journal/Periodical: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. 1970-Present. Britannia. I-XXXIV. 7/319-20 Wilson D R 1976.
  • <5> Journal/Periodical: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. 1970-Present. Britannia. I-XXXIV. 8/385 Wilson D R 1977.
  • <6> Journal/Periodical: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. 1970-Present. Britannia. I-XXXIV. 9/429-30 Wilson D R 1978.
  • <7> Book: Harris, B.E. (ed). 1987. Victoria County History - A History of the County of Chester: Volume I. p122-4, 127-8.
  • <8> Article in Journal: McPeake J.C.. 1978. The First Century. Chester Conference Nov 1977: New Evidence for Roman Chester. /13-16.
  • <9> Client Report: Earthworks Archaeological Services. 2004. Proposed breach in the City Walls at Rufus Court, Chester. R2533. SO406. N/A. R2533.

Related Monuments/Buildings (1)

Related Events/Activities (1)

External Links (0)

Location

Grid reference Centred SJ 404 666 (33m by 14m) (2 map features)
Map sheet SJ46NW
Civil Parish CHESTER NON PARISH AREA, CHESTER, CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER
Historic Township/Parish/County CHESTER, CHESTER HOLY TRINITY, CHESHIRE

Protected Status/Designation

Record last edited

Jul 4 2024 1:28PM